| Min. price: | 1 lb price: | Cust1 price: | Cust2 price: | Max. price: |
| Min. quant.: | 1 lb quant: | Cust1 quant: | Cust2 quant: | Max.quant: |
Detailed Listing For:
Botanical Name:
Pinus Sylvestris
Family:
PINACEAE
Genus:
Pinus
Species:
sylvestris
Common Name:
Scotch Pine, Scots Pine
Stated Source:
France, Casadeen Massif
Lot#:
090439
Quantity:
16.99 lb
Avg Count Packet:
57
Average Seeds Per Pound:
66284
Germination:
79%
Germination Test Type:
Purity:
99%
Height:
75 feet
1 pkt
$
4.95
1 oz
$
21.21
Characteristics
Bonsai
Christmas Tree
Evergreen
Fast Growth
Mine Reclamation
Screen/Windbreak
Timber
Growing Info
Scarification
Soak in water, let stand in water for 24 hours
Stratification
cold stratify for 90 days
Germination
sow seed 1/8" deep , tamp the soil, mulch the seed bed
Description
From www.mgr.net: Root growth potential of scotch pine seed sources
and its relationship to field performance
James E. JOHNSON, Richard E. KREH, John L. TORBERT, and Peter P. FERET
School of Forestry Wildlife Resources
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
Paper read at the Northeastern State, Federal and Provincial Nurserymen's Conference, Montreal, Quebec,
July 24 to July 27, 1990.
Abstract:
Commercially available Scotch pine seed sources were
studied to determine root growth potential (RGP), field
performance, and the relationship between RGP and field
performance in the Mountain, Piedmont, and Coastal
Plain physiographic regions of Virginia. RGP's ranged
from 41 new roots for the Lower Austria seed source to 7
new roots for the Burgos seed source. Seed sources
varied in field performance across the state. Overall,
second year survival was greatest in the Mountains
(79%), and significantly lower in the Piedmont and Coastal
Plain (64% each). The seed sources with the highest
and lowest RGP's also exhibited the highest and lowest
field survivals and field performance as measured by
volume increase.
Key words: root growth, containerized seedlings, tree
planting, Christmas trees.
Résumé
Le potentiel de croissance racinaire des provenances
de graines de pin sylvestre et ses rapports avec leur
rendement sur le terrain.
On a etudie les diverses provenances de graines de pin
sylvestre disponibles dans le commerce afin d'evaluer
leur rythme de croissance racinaire (RCR), leur rendement
sur le terrain ainsi quo la relation entre celui-ci et le
RCR, dans les trois regions physiographiques de la
Virginie : montagneuse, de piedmont et de la plaine
cOtiere. Le RCR a varie de 41 racines nouvelles pour la
provenance de Basso Autriche a 7 racines nouvelles
pour la provenance n Burgos A travers tout l'Etat, les
rendements sur le terrain ont varie selon les provenances.
Dans /'ensemble, le faux de survie pour la
deuxieme annee a ete superieur dans la region montagneuse
(79 %) mais significativement plus faible dans le
piedmont et la plaine c6tiere (64 % chacune). Les provenances
montrant les RCR les plus hauts et les plus bas
presentaient aussi les faux de survie les plus forts et les
plus faibles.
Mots-cles : croissance racinaire, recipients,
plantation, arbres de Noel
Introduction:
Production of seedlings for Christmas trees in the
U.S. is increasing each year. The National Christmas
Tree Association estimated the 1988 planting at over
73.5 million seedlings, an increase of nearly 12%
since 1984. With Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) as
the major Christmas tree species, nursery producers
are interested in seedling characteristics and
quality differences among the major seed sources
and varieties. Variability in growth, morphological
features, and pest resistance of numerous Scotch
pine varieties have been studied in the north central
U.S. (WRIGHT et al. 1 966); and currently many varieties
are available from commercial seed dealers and
nurseries throughout the country (Noecker 1988).
The concept of root growth potential (RGP), introduced
by Stone (1955), has emerged as a useful
method of estimating the physiological status of
seedlings. Root growth potential is defined as the
ability of a tree seedling to initiate and elongate roots
when placed into an environment favorable for root
growth (Ritchie 1985).
This study was established to compare the growth
and phenotypic characteristics of 15 commercially
available seed sources of Scotch pine, with particular
reference to suitability for Christmas tree production
in Virginia. This paper deals with the
establishment phase of the Scotch pine plantations,
and reports potential (RGP), field performance and
discusses the overall relationship between RGP and
field performance.
Methods:
Stock Production:
Seed was obtained from commercial sources for 15
Scotch pine seed sources, stratified at 4°C for 45
days, then sown, three seeds per container, in April,
1986. Following germination seedlings were thinned
to one per container. Seedlings were grown in 65
cm
3
container cells in a 50:50 Promix BX/sand mix
in the greenhouse under natural light supplemented
with artificial lighting to 11:00 p.m. Seedlings were
periodically irrigated, fertilized with a complete
liquid fertilizer, and treated with a commercial fungicide.
During November, 1986, the seedlings were
placed under natural light to induce dormancy and
then placed in an outdoor slat house in January,
1987.
149
RGP Test:
During March of 1987, 30 seedlings of each seed
source were removed from the containers and all
potting medium was washed from the root systems.
The seedlings were placed in a well-aerated water
bath held at a constant 18°C temperature for 21
days. Day length was supplemented by artificial light
to 16 hours per day. Following the test period the
seedlings were removed from the water bath, and
all new roots were counted. RGP was expressed as
the total number of new roots which grew during the
test period. The RGP test was not conducted on the
Musser Forest's seed source due to inadequate
germination of this seed source leading to an insufficient
number of seedlings. The entire RGP test was
repeated three times to coincide with the beginning,
middle, and end of the planting season.
Field Planting:
Sites for field planting were selected within each of
the three physiographic regions of Virginia. Accordingly,
three sites were located in the Coastal Plain,
Piedmont, and Appalachian Mountains .
All of the planting sites were previously abandoned
fields, with a mixture of annual grasses and broadleaved
weeks.
Planting sites included a wide variety of soil and
cli matic conditions. Soil testing data for the surface
15 cm of each of the planting sites is provided in
Table 1. The soils varied in texture from sandy loams
to loams, and included a range of soil fertility levels.
Climatic characteristics vary greatly throughout the
study area. In the Mountains the average temperatures
range from –7°C in winter to 28°C in summer,
with an average annual precipitation of 102 cm. The
normal growing season is about 129 days long.
Climatic conditions in the Piedmont vary considerably,
but on the average the temperatures range
between –3°C in winter and 31°C in summer. Total
annual precipitation averages 110 cm, and the
growing season is about 190 days long. In the
Coastal Plain average temperatures range from 0°C
in winter to 30°C in summer, with the average precipitation
totaling 113 cm. The growing season in
the Coastal Plain is the longest in the state, averaging
214 days.
The plantations were established during March and
April, 1987, by hand-planting the containerized
seedlings in hand-scalped planting spots. In each
plantation, each seed source was represented by 15
seedlings planted at random locations on a 2 m by
2 m grid (i.e. single-tree plots).
Plantation Maintenance and Seedling
Measurements:
In all plantations weed control was accomplished
using a combination of fall glyphosate applications
and spring simizine applications, both applied as
directed sprays. In some plantations additional
weed control was accomplished by mowing. In all
plantations the seedlings were kept in a free-to-grow
condition, above the grass and herbaceous competition.
Woody brush competition was not a factor in
any plantation.
After the 1987 and 1988 growing seasons, all plantations
were checked for survival, and seedling
heights and ground-line diameters were measured.
Results and discussion:
RGP Difference Between Varieties
RGP varied considerably between the 14 Scotch
pine seed sources tested. The Lower
Austria and Belgium sources had an RGP of 41 and
35 new roots, respectively. The seed sources with
the lowest RGP included Eastern U.S., Turkey,
Guadarrama, Guadalaraja, and Burgos, ranging
from 16 to 7 new roots . All other varieties
had an RGP of between 17 and 29 new roots.
Differences in RGP between species, grown under
identical test conditions, can be dramatic (RITCHIE
and DUNLAP 1980). Likewise, differences among
seed sources and among families within a species
have also been reported (RITCHIE 1985, SUTTON
1983, DEWALD et al. 1985). Generally, RGP is thought
to be under strong genetic influence. Even when
differences in RGP between provenances of eastern
white pine (Pinus strobus L.) were not significant,
differences in RGP between individual families were
apparent (JOHNSEN et al. 1988).
Due to the great geographic variation of the natural
range of Scotch pine, it is highly likely that different
seed sources have different chilling requirements
necessary to break bud dormancy. There is
evidence that the peak of RGP is related to the
dormancy cycle, with the peak occurring in midwinter,
followed by the main root growth activity in
early spring, which then declines with the advent of
shoot growth (RITCHIE and DUNLAP 1980). The
chilling conditions provided in this experiment may
have been optimum for some of the seed sources,
151
I
1 A
153
but not for others. Geographic variation in chilling
requirement within a species has been observed
(RITCHIE and DUNLAP 1980), and may partially ex-
- plain the wide variety of RGP's reported here.
Field Performance
Survival over all physiographic regions
ranged from 42 to 78 percent with the
lowest one being the Burgos seed source which
also had the lowest RGP.
Overall
seedling survival was greatest in the Mountains
(79%) as compared to the Piedmont and Coastal
Plain (64% each).
Within each of the regions there were differences
among seed source in survival. On the Coastal Plain
a group of 11 seed sources had the highest survival
rate, ranging from 58 to 84%. In the Mountains this
same group, plus the Eastern U.S. variety, had the
highest survival, ranging from 71 to 91%. Survival in
the Piedmont was highly variable, ranging from 36
to 73%, with no significant differences between seed
sources. On the Coastal Plain the French Auvergne
and Lower Austria sources were the top survivors;
in the Mountains the Lower Austria and Central
Massif sources survived the best, and on the Coastal
Plain the Casadeen Massif, Turkey, Riga, and
French Auvergne sources topped the list .
.
Although these variables are not growth variables
per se, they are indicative of the overall vigor of the
seedlings and consequently the degree to which
they are adapted to the planting sites. Since the
containerized seedlings were all similarly sized at
the time of planting and had all been growing for two
seasons, second-year seedling dimensions, prior to
shearing, provide a good measure of seedling
establishment.
The largest seedlings in terms of volume were
produced by the Lower Austria seed source when
averaged over all planting sites and corresponds to
the one with the highest RGP . On a
physiographic basis, the largest seedlings grew in
the Mountains, followed by the Coastal Plain and the
Piedmont . Within each region there were
significant differences between sources in seedling
height, diameter, and volume. Across all regions the
Lower Austria source stands out as the fastest
growing. This source also survived well throughout
the state. Previous Scotch pine seed source studies
have shown that seedling growth is closely correlated
with origin of seed (KING 1965a, 1965b, WRIGHt
et al. 1966). In the north central U.S., Scotch pine
seed sources from central Europe grew most rapidly,
while northern varieties were the slowest growing.
Our study contains no Scandinavian seed
sources; however, the largest seedlings tended to
be from central European locations.
WRIGHT et al. (1966) found that Scotch pine sources
often perform similarly across a wide variety of sites,
and that the seed source X site interaction only
accounted for about five percent of the variation in
seedling height. The varieties in this study also tended
to perform similarly throughout the regions. For
example, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient
for seedling volume between the Mountain and
Piedmont sites was 0.82. The largest seedlings in
the top three sources in the Mountains (Lower
Austria, Belgium, and Bugenland) were also the
largest in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont. All
sources tended to perform poorly on the Piedmont.
Climatically this region is intermediate between the
Coastal Plain and Mountains; however, the soils
tended to be much more similar to those of the
Mountain sites. Unfortunately this region experienced
unusual drought periods in the first and second
year of the study which confounded performance
similarities. WRIGHT et al. (1966) found the best
growth of Scotch pine seedlings on sandy loam to
loam soils. It may be that the combination of climate
and soils found in the Piedmont are the least desirable
conditions for Scotch pine survival and growth.
Relationship Between RGP and Field Performance
Numerous studies have shown high RGP to be
correlated with good field performance for a number
of pine species, including loblolly pine (Pinus taeda
L.) (FERET and KREH 1985), ponderosa pine (Pinus
ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws) (STONE 1955), jack pine
(Pinus banksiana Lamb.) (SUTTON 1987), and lodgepole
pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud)
(BURDETTE et al.1983). Presumably RGP is positively
correlated with seedling characteristics important to
survival and growth during the first year following
planting. Alternatively RGP may be the direct cause
of survival and early growth because of its relationship
to root-soil contact. RITCHIE (1985) indicated that
with Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.)
Franco), RGP may be related to cold and stress
resistance, while CARLSON (1986) indicated that
157
NICHOLS, T. J. 1989. Shearing. p. 79-103 In Johnson,
J. E. (ed.) Christmas Tree Production Manual.
VA Coop. Ext. Serv. Pub. 420-075. VA Polytech.
Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
NOECKER, N. 1988. Scotch pine varieties, characteristics,
and performance. Christmas Trees 16
: 34-41.
RITCHIE, G. A. 1985. Root growth potential : principles,
procedures, and predictive ability. p. 93-
105 In Duryea, M. L (ed.) Evaluating Seedling
Quality : Principles, Procedures, and Predictive
Abilities of Major Tests. Oregon State Univ.,
Forest Research Lab., Corvallis, OR.
RITCHIE, G. A., and J. R. DUNLAP. 1980. Root growth
potential: its development and expression in
forest tree seedlings. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 10 :
218-248.
STONE, E. C. 1955. Poor survival and the physiological
condition of planting stock. For. Sci. 1 :
90-94.
SUTTON, R. F. 1983. Root growth capacity: relationship
with field root growth and performance in
outplanted jack pine and black spruce. Plant
and Soil 71:111-122.
SUTTON, R. F. 1987. Root growth capacity and field
performance of jack pine and black spruce in
boreal stand establishment in Ontario. Can. J.
For. Res. 17 : 194-804.
WRIGHT, J. W., S. S. PAULEY, R. B. POLK, J. J. JOKELA,
and R. A. READ. 1966. Performance of Scotch
pine varieties in the North Central
Comments
Irregular pyramid shape in its youth often used as a Christmas tree. Open with a round or flat top with widespreading branches as it matures.Needles are 1-3" long. Orangish brown bark. Extremely adaptable to various soils 



